|
Humans employ the oceans for two very different and seemingly incompatible uses: as a waste disposal system and as a source of food. The marine ecosystem is capable of being both, but the extent of our use is taxing the system beyond its natural capabilities. For example, biological systems in the ocean have the ability to recycle naturally occurring organic wastes such as dead organisms or feces, but they are unable to break down and detoxify many of the human made or human altered chemicals that we dump into our seas. Until recently, human impact was relatively minor because the vastness of the oceans and the effectiveness of ocean currents were able to diffuse and dilute these human made toxic chemicals to the point where their impact on the ocean ecosystem was negligible. But as with many other human impacts, we are reaching the point where humans can no longer expect to use the world's oceans as a huge and inexpensive waste disposal system, because that use is beginning to conflict with its other use as a food source for human consumption (see Figure 18 showing ocean pollution hot spots on Canada's coasts).
[Figure 18]:Canada's ocean pollution hot spots. Source : Government of Canada, 1991. As a source of food, the world's oceans are suffering not only from poisoning through their use as a human waste disposal system, but also from the direct overexploitation of their resources. Our technological ability to harvest fish and shellfish from the sea now far outstrips the ability of the sea to produce them. In fact some recent technological innovations, such as drift nets, not only result in higher yields but also in significantly more waste of these resources. In many ways, the problem is similar to the degradation of agricultural land, where crops are harvested and no effort is made to limit the harvest or conserve the productive capacity of the soil. Unfortunately, the solutions to overexploitation in the world's oceans are more difficult to achieve because the productive capacity of the oceans is common property and because of the migratory nature of the stock. In the case of degraded land, the owner can decide to reduce the yield from his or her land for a period of time, thus restoring the soil capacity for future use. In the ocean, an individual can still decide to reduce his or her yield, but any fish not captured by that individual will likely be caught by another. Since reduced yields and conservation will not create any benefits for the conserver, voluntary, individual action to reduce harvesting and permit stock replenishment is unlikely to occur. Canadians are beginning to see the effects of overexploitation in terms of depleted fish stocks off Canada's own Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and are also experiencing some of the difficulties associated with attempting to conserve a common property resource. The northern cod stocks off Newfoundland were closed to fishing in the summer of 1992 to give the cod population an opportunity to recover. Although many of the feeding grounds for northern cod are within Canada's territorial jurisdiction, some cod can still be caught in international waters beyond its 200 mile limit. If international agreements cannot be negotiated with other fishing nations, the rate of recovery for the northern cod population will be reduced.
What are the likely impacts on Canada and the world?As human population increases and agricultural land becomes degraded the oceans will have to play, by necessity, a more dominant role in feeding humankind. Yet we continue to squeeze the productive capacity of our oceans through ocean pollution and overexploitation. Despite improvements in harvesting technology, the total global fish catch declined in 1990 for the first time in 13 years. Although some may argue that this was due to natural fluctuations in fish stocks and increased conservation efforts, others point to this downturn as a sign that overfishing and water pollution are beginning to have an impact upon productive capacity. In addition to productive capacity, the quality of the fish and shellfish taken from the world's oceans is also a significant concern. The heavy metals and synthetic organic compounds that society dumps into the oceans are taken up into the food chain. As organisms consume other organisms, nutrients are processed but these metals and synthetic chemicals often accumulate in the organism's fat cells. Moving up the food chain toward the larger predatory fish and swimming mammals, the concentration of these chemicals multiplies in a process that is known as bioaccumulation or biomagnification. For example, at the mouth of the St. Lawrence river, dead beluga whales have been found washed up on shore. The pollution coming out of the river, along with the process of bioaccumulation, have so contaminated the flesh of some of those dead beluga that they were classified as hazardous waste and had to be disposed of accordingly. The seriousness of the situation becomes evident when one considers that beluga whales represent one of the top levels of the marine food web -- a level that is shared with fish eating humans.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() GO TO NEXT SECTION | ![]() GO TO LAST SECTION |